Justice for all? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice

By Michael W. Morris, K. Leung. 2000

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b0bbdaf9fb9d8fff6bc2ff11d19080d1884b959

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. (2002, background): “…as “facts of life” to which people must accommodate; (b) boundaries between in-groups and out-groups are stable, relatively impermeable, and important; and (c) in-group exchanges are based on equality or even generosity principles (U. Kim, 1994; Morris & Leung, 2000; Sayle, 1998; Triandis, 1995).”
Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: : integrating self-determination and social exchange theories (2014, background): “Although justice concerns are universal, there are cultural differences in reactions to justice perceptions (Morris and Leung, 2000).”
Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis (2015, background): “Indeed, research suggests that in collectivistic cultures, people often reciprocate with generosity that goes beyond quid-pro-quo principles (e.g., Morris and Leung 2000; Triandis 1995).”
Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice (2004, background): “In spite of the recognition that politics perception is inherent in organizational life and the universality of concerns about fairness (Morris & Leung, 2000; Pearce, Bigley, & Branyiczki, 1998), much of the extant research (particularly on organizational politics) has focused on Western,…”
Self-disclosure and Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Culture (2012, background): “Collectivism in Germany, on the other hand, “takes the form of a legal-bureaucratic orientation combining low economic individualism, low affective collectivism, and an emphasis on formal rules and categories” (Morris and Leung 2000, p. 112).”
Team‐based reward allocation structures and the helping behaviors of outcome‐interdependent team members (2009, background): “vary from one country to the next (Morris and Leung, 2000), researchers may wish to explore the degree to which our findings are robust cross-culturally.”
The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment (2013, unknown): “In addition, collectivists are more likely to view others’ motives and intentions as benevolent (Huff & Kelley, 2003), to acquiesce to authority figures (Morris & Leung, 2000), and to accept monitoring and sanctioning to ensure conformance to group norms (Yamagishi, Cook, & Watabe, 1998).”
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, unknown): “…theories of identity (Brewer & Gardner, 1996), and cultural approaches to social psychology (Fiske, Kitayama, Markus, & Nisbett, 1998; Morris & Leung, 2000; Triandis, 1989) posit that at any given time, people are behaving in accord with a particular social role instantiated in culture that…”
A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework (2006, background): “Given that procedural justice, in particular, has its theoretical roots in the group value model, which posits that fairness perceptions are based on one’s relative standing to others, perhaps IND–COL or PD have Type I relationships with justice perceptions (Morris and Leung, 2000).”
Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics (2015, background): “Throughout the 1990s cross-cultural researchers refined value scales, grasping for a version that would mediate effects of national culture on organizational judgments and behaviors, but evidence has been mixed at best (see Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002; Morris & Leung, 2000).”
Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making (2011, background): “…out-groups feel stable, relatively impermeable, and important, so that in-group exchanges may be based in equality or even generosity principles but out-groups exchanges are utilitarian, out-groups are not to be trusted and can be cheated (Morris & Leung, 2000; Sayle, 1998; Triandis, 1995, 2007).”