The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Rationale, description and summary of psychometric properties.

By R. Bar-On. 2004

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a0b5b6b4d282097de7ff6cbcf37c1b2b95462a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire in sports and its links with performance satisfaction (2014, methodology): “Those most frequently used in the literature are the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (Bar-On, 2004), the Schutte EI Scale (Schutte et al., 1998), and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue, Petrides, 2009a).”
Educating People to Be Emotionally Intelligent (2007, methodology): “In three additional studies (Bar-On 2004; Bar-On et al. 2005), leadership capability was studied by: How Important Is It, and Can It Be Done? 7”
Emotional Intelligence: An Integral Part of Positive Psychology (2010, background): “In anumber of studies that have been conducted over the past decade (e.g. Bar-On, 1997b, 2004, 2006a, 2006b; Bar-On, Handley, & Fund, 2006; Ruderman & Bar-On, 2003), EI has consistently demonstrated a highly significant relationship with occupational performance.”
Human abilities: emotional intelligence. (2008, methodology): “These approaches use very broad definitions of EI that include “noncognitive capability, competency, or skill” (Bar-On 1997) and/or “emotionally and socially intelligent behavior” (Bar-On 2004, p. 122), and “dispositions from the personality domain” (Petrides & Furnham 2003, pp. 278–280).”
The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). (2006, methodology): “A consensus of findings reveals that the Bar-On conceptual and assessment model is consistent, stable and reliable (Bar-On, 2004).”
Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards (2011, methodology): “…(if only they focus exclusively on emotion-related cognitive abilities) (Mayer, Salovey and Caruso, 2000), self-report methods are much more consistent with the approach adopted by mixed-model proponents (Bar-On, 2004), mainly because they are more dependent on personality traits’ influence.”
Emotional intelligence: new ability or eclectic traits? (2008, background): “Yet, other investigators describe emotional intelligence as an eclectic mix of traits, many dispositional, such as happiness, selfesteem, optimism, and self-management rather than ability-based (Bar-On, 2004; Boyatzis & Sala, 2004; Petrides & Furnham, 2001; Tett, Fox, & Wang, 2005).”
Assessing emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted high school students: Outcomes depend on the measure (2005, background): “Bar-On (2004) presents results from 8 unpublished studies of the MSCEIT and the EQ-i, that show an average un-weighted correlation of .31 between these measures (total n=1256).”
The mediation role of leadership styles in integrated project collaboration: An emotional intelligence perspective (2018, background): “Specifically, he stated that the application of individual personality could contribute to EI improvement, and thus impact the project performance (Bar-On, 2004).”
Social, Emotional, Ethical, and Academic Education: Creating a Climate for Learning, Participation in Democracy, and Well-Being. (2006, background): “…are several important emotional-social intelligence self-report measures that have been normed and used with adults, children, and adolescents (Bar-on, 2004; Bar-on & Parker, 2000; Stewart-Brown & edmund, 2003; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, in press). there are also emotional intelligence tests…”
Emotional Intelligence: Toward Clarification of a Concept (2010, methodology): “Internal consistency reliability ranges from .86 to .94, with an overall estimate of .97 (Bar-On, 2004) and a test–retest reliability of .79 after 3 months (Conte & Dean, 2006).”