Social interaction in learning and instruction : the meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge
By H. Cowie, G. M. Aalsvoort. 2000
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19e8f4a66691839225ecadce0ab9cb58da3141c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jaana Isohätälä
- Piia Näykki
- C. Albarran
- Sanna Järvelä
- Sylvia Rojas-Drummond
- Karen Littleton
- S. Harkness
- C. Super
Citations in the corpus
- Teachers' ethnotheories of the ‘ideal student’ in five western cultures (2007, result): “Consistent with this finding, the Dutch psychologist Paul Leseman emphasizes the importance of the social environment of kindergarten classrooms, especially encouraging intersubjectivity and cooperation in child-initiated activities (Leseman et al. , 2000).”
- Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts (2008, methodology): “At the same time, drawing on Sharples’ model, she reports the use of different strategies by the children in relation to the phases of writing they were engaged in.”
- Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction (2017, background): “Researchers in the sociocultural research tradition have also used the term collective argumentation (Brown & Renshaw, 2000; Ryu & Lombardi, 2015) and drawn connections with exploratory talk (Mercer, 1996).”
- Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education (2011, background): “Theorists have also distinguished between adversarial argumentation, in which the goal is to “win” an argument, as in a debate, and collaborative argumentation, in which students work cooperatively to explore and critique different ideas (Brown & Renshaw, 2000; Gilbert, 1997).”