Risk management processes in supplier networks
By Jukka Hallikas, I. Karvonen, U. Pulkkinen, V. Virolainen, M. Tuominen. 2004
745 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1987bb26fd0d6aef9999f689d9988cdb780df847
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Federico Caniato
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Christoph Bode
- Tobias Schoenherr
- Haritha Saranga
- Olivier Lavastre
- Stephan M. Wagner
- Heiko A. Gracht
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Christoph Bode
- Dmitry A. Ivanov
- Tobias Schoenherr
- Olivier Lavastre
- Stephan M. Wagner
- Inga-Lena Darkow
- Heiko A. Gracht
In Strategy and Management
- Dmitry A. Ivanov
- Alexandre Dolgui
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Boris V. Sokolov
- Alain Spalanzani
- Olivier Lavastre
- Stephan M. Wagner
- Christoph Bode
Citations in the corpus
- DO PERCEPTIONS BECOME REALITY? THE MODERATING ROLE OF SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCY ON DISRUPTION OCCURRENCE (2010, background): “Typical risk management processes for enterprise risks in general (Damodaran 2007; Waring and Glendon 1998) and supply and supply chain risks in particular (de Waart 2006; Hallikas et al. 2004; Sheffi and Rice 2005), encompass the stages of (1) risk identification, (2) risk analysis (including risk ”
- Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain* (2017, background): “We refer to the works of Hallikas et al. (2004); Zsidisin et al. (2004); Hendricks and Singhal (2005); Kleindorfer and Saad (2005); Tomlin (2006); Craighead et al. (2007); Ritchie and Brindley (2007); Blackhurst et al. (2011); Bode et al. (2011); Chaudhuri et al. (2013); Chen et al. (2013); Pettit…”
- Managing country disruption risks and improving operational performance: risk management along integrated supply chains (2016, background): “information sharing, responsiveness and thus reducing vulnerability (Chopra & Sodhi 2004; Giunipero & Eltantawy, 2004; Hallikas et al., 2004).”
- Supply Chain Risk Management: Present and Future Scope (2012, neutral): “…supply chain environments (Christopher and Peck, 2006; Khan et al., 2008), risks and mitigation best practices (Finch, 2004), knowledge management to manage risks (Hallikas et al., 2004), holistic nature of supply chain risks within the automotive and electronic industries (Mauricio et al., 2004).”
- Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation (2017, background): “While several case based studies (eg., Hallikas et al., 2004; Tang, 2006) and conceptual studies (e.g., Trkman and McCormack, 2009; Tang and Nurmaya Musa, 2011) have been carried out in the area of supply chain risk identification and mitigation, empirical survey based research is still at a…”
- An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability (2006, background): “We found assumptions that supply chain vulnerability is increased by customer dependence (Hallikas et al., 2005; Svensson, 2004a), supplier dependence (Giunipero and Eltantawy, 2004; Hendricks and Singhal, 2005a; Ju¨ttner, 2005; Spekman and Davis, 2004; Svensson, 2004a), supplier concentration…”
- Supply Chain Risk Management in Financial Crises – A Multiple Case-Study Approach (2011, positive): “Hallikas et al. (2004) presented methods for risk management in a complex network environment, and Tang and Tomlin (2008) illustrated the power of flexibility in mitigating supply chain risks.”
- Supply risk management via guanxi in the Chinese business context: The buyer's perspective (2012, background): “When dependence between firms deepens, firms are more exposed to risk from other firms (Hallikas et al., 2004; Swink and Zsidisin, 2006).”
- Supply chain risk management in French companies (2012, methodology): “The tools used to deal with the different phases of SCRM are: risk identification and analysis, risk assessment, decision and implementation of risk management actions, and risk monitoring [16,60,66].”
- Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms (2014, methodology): “In the models of SCRM (Harland, Brenchley, and Walker 2003; Chopra and Sodhi 2004; Hallikas et al. 2004; Norrman and Jansson 2004), the goal of these models is the action of mitigating the SCR and is the process of SCRM (overall activities, sequence of steps one after the other) to better manage the”
- Risk management in supply chain: a real option approach (2006, background): “In such case, in fact, if the firm is not able to adopt the necessary measures directed to extend the productive ability at the right moment, part of the consumer demand will be unsatisfied (Hallikas et al., 2004).”
- A Delphi-based risk analysis — Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment (2013, background): “The global character of today's supply chains and the dependency of supply chain partners on each other may cause one company to expose other companies to their risks [48].”