Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain*

By Dmitry A. Ivanov, Alexandre Dolgui, Boris V. Sokolov, Marina Ivanova. International Journal of Production Research, 2017

608 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eca78c2f21984819b2f19d723543c5d7f25d7e25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience (2018, neutral): “Supply chain (SC) design and planning seek to find a structural-process-parametrical form of a value-adding network and its operation in time subject to some goal criteria, e.g., costs minimization (Chopra and Meindl 2015, Ivanov et al. 2017a, Calleja et al. 2018).”
Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case (2020, positive): “Most of the existing studies utilize discrete-event simulation approach (Schmitt and Singh, 2012, Ivanov, 2017a, 2017b, Schmitt et al., 2017, Ivanov and Rozhkov, 2017, Macdonald et al., 2018, Ivanov, 2019, Tan et al., 2020) while some studies use agent-based (Li and Chan, 2013, Hou et al., 2018,…”
Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis (2020, background): “Recently, some scholars have proposed systematic reviews about SCD, including Snyder et al. (2016), Paul, Sarker, and Essam (2016), Ivanov et al. (2017), and Mishra et al. (2018).”
The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics (2018, background): “Ivanov (2017) considered a four-stage SC that comprises a man-ufacturer, a central distribution centre, two regional distribution centres and ten customers in different European cities.”
Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† (2019, background): “…and Daskin 2012; Mizgier, Wagner, and Holyst 2012; Ivanov, Sokolov, and Dolgui 2014a; Ivanov, Sokolov, and Pavlov 2014b; Lu, Ran, and Shen 2015; Ivanov et al. 2017, 2019; Ivanov and Dolgui 2018; Ojha et al. 2018) describes disruption propagation in the SC, the resulting SC structural dynamics,…”
Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective (2018, background): “For a recent review of literature on supply chain disruptions and recovery, see Ivanov et al. (2017).”
Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study (2020, methodology): “These digital technologies are increasingly applied in SCRM research as they influence the optimization of processes to avoid disruptions and risks (Bugert and Lasch, 2018; Hosseini et al., 2019; Ivanov et al., 2017).”
Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks (2018, methodology): “Considering this type of disruptions and proposing an appropriate model like R-interdiction model (Golany et al. 2009; Liberatore, Scaparra, and Daskin 2011; Aksen and Aras 2012), might be interesting, as evidenced by the comprehensive literature review by Snyder et al. (2015), Ivanov et al. (2017).”
A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0 (2020, neutral): “The research on the recovery stage is still new and requires further study (Bode and Macdonald 2017; Ivanov et al. 2017).”
A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing (2019, background): “Multi-factor supplier se-27 lection has been recently extended by inclusion of disruption risks to address SC resilience [5, 6, 7, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36].”
Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature (2018, background): “A recent survey on reactive policies for SC disruption recovery can be found in (Ivanov et al. 2017b).”
Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda (2021, methodology): “Several literature reviews have described the stages, methods and techniques of firm reaction and recovery after a disruption (Dolgui et al. 2018; DuHadway et al. 2019; Ivanov 2020b; Ivanov et al. 2017; Sawik 2019).”