Privatization and public-private partnerships

By Eugene B. McGregor. 2004

530 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/187c89e29898c5e805f7ed17c47fa572cb41d737

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox (2011, background): “Privatization, contracting-out and PPPs, which are very different in nature and impact, are too often presumed to be synonymous (Linder, 1999; Savas, 2000).”
Public Values in Public–Private Partnerships (2014, background): “Others studies focus on the effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and economical performance of PPPs (e.g., Savas, 2000; Van Ham & Koppenjan, 2001).”
On Public–Private Partnership Performance (2017, background): “…and Greve (2007); Berg, Pollitt, and Tsuji (2002); Bovaird (2004); Ghobadian, Gallear, O’Regan, and Viney (2004); Edwards, Shaoul, Stafford, and Arblaster (2004); Grimsey and Lewis (2004); Osborne (2001); Perrot and Chatelus (2000); Pollitt (2005); Savas (2000); Shaoul (2005); and Rosenau (2000).”
The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web (2013, background): “Yet, the old evangelical fervour that expected outsourcing to generate significant savings, culture change or innovations in public services delivery has largely evaporated [13,14].”
Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public–Private Delivery of City Services (2008, background): “The notion that private delivery is cheaper remains a primary philosophical driver for contracting (Eggers & O'Leary, 1995; Savas, 2000) although the empirical literature does not lend strong support (Bel & Warner, 2007; Boyne, 1998a; Entwistle & Martin, 2005).”
The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education (2009, background): “Savas (2000) presents a comprehensive discussion of the steps involved in contracting for the delivery of public services.”
The Privatization Decision (2003, background): “One of privatization’s most vocal advocates states that “the primary goal of any privatization effort is, or should be, to introduce competition and market forces in the delivery of public services” (Savas, 2000, p. 122).”
Applying Market Solutions to Public Services (2002, background): “Privatemarketsmay enhance citizen voice by promoting consumer sovereignty (Savas 2000).”
Framing and selling global education policy: the promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts (2012, background): “In contrast, expressions such as PPPs invite more people and organizations to join the debate and enable private organizations to get a market share over public service provision with more ease (Hodge and Greve 2010; Linder 1999; Savas 2000; Teisman and Klijn 2002).”
Government Contracts and “Managing the Market” (2012, background): “That logic rests squarely on the potential of competition to decrease costs and to enhance the efficiency of government programs and services (Boyne, 1998; Bretschneider & Ya Ni, 2007; Pack, 1987; Savas, 2000; Sclar, 2000).”
Design and redesign of a quasi-market for the reintegration of jobseekers: empirical evidence from Australia and the Netherlands (2005, background): “Market systems generally lead to enhanced efficiency: this view is generally confirmed, though is sometimes demonstrated on the basis of satisfaction measurements, which raises doubts about the methodology (Savas, 2000).”
Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question (2010, unknown): “Th e rationale for creating such arrangements includes both ideological and pragmatic perspectives (Savas 2000).”