Examining the factor structure of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory with an Australian general population sample

By Benjamin R. Palmer, R. Manocha, Gilles E. Gignac, Con Stough. 2003

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/180fd757855cbd3a6f261121460abea2bfa25904

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. K. V. Petrides
2. Adrian Furnham
3. J. Pérez‐González
4. T. Nettelbeck
5. Pam Qualter
6. V. Bastian
7. Nicholas R. Burns
8. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. K. V. Petrides
2. Adrian Furnham
3. J. Pérez‐González
4. T. Nettelbeck
5. Nicholas R. Burns
6. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
7. Jean–Marc Dewaele
8. Chengchen Li

In Social Psychology

1. K. V. Petrides
2. Adrian Furnham
3. J. Pérez‐González
4. T. Nettelbeck
5. Pam Qualter
6. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
7. V. Bastian
8. Nicholas R. Burns

Citations in the corpus

• Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities (2005, background): “Additionally, after controlling for personality and verbal Scholastic Aptitude Test scores, Brackett & Mayer (2003) found that AES, EQ-i and MSCEIT no longer correlated significantly with GPA (r = .10, .08, .05, respectively).”
• On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence (2007, background): “Its psychometric properties were scrutinised in Petrides and Furnham ( 2001 ) and Palmer, Manocha, Gignac, and Stough ( 2003 ), who reported factor structure problems that are, however, of limited relevance to the present paper.”