Gilles E. Gignac

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2003–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 67 researchers and is trusted by 37 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 61 citations into it; #1,400 of 9,731 by trust here, #2,296 by citations
• Social Psychology — 50 citations into it; #2,727 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,293 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 39 citations into it; #2,536 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,692 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 37 citations into it; #3,549 of 11,946 by trust here, #8,469 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 31 citations into it; #2,658 of 12,932 by trust here, #6,080 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 30 citations into it; #3,876 of 22,756 by trust here, #4,189 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 21 citations into it; #6,548 of 10,852 by trust here, #10,534 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 17 citations into it; #709 of 3,868 by trust here, #1,510 by citations

Whom Gilles E. Gignac trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. R. Dumont
2. A.R. Jensen
3. W. Viechtbauer
4. Uri Simonsohn
5. Keith J. Holyoak
6. F. Chen
7. Michael A. McDaniel
8. A. Murray
9. P. Lachenbruch
10. Hirotogu Akaike

Who trusts Gilles E. Gignac overall

1. Lisa Wagner
2. Baptiste Barbot
3. Laura Wray‐Lake
4. Ashley L. Watts
5. Vera Monteiro
6. J. Dubois
7. Alexandre J. S. Morin
8. Marcin Zajenkowski
9. Craig Hedge
10. Raluca Livinƫi

Papers from Gilles E. Gignac's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gilles E. Gignac trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
2. Book Review: The g-factor, the science of mental ability
3. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. (Annual Review of Psychology)
4. Estimating the Dimension of a Model
5. The case for motivated reasoning.
6. A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life (Multivariate Behavioral Research)
7. The Higher-stratum Structure of Cognitive Abilities: Current Evidence Supports g and About Ten Broad Factors
8. Bias in Mental Testing
9. The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models
10. A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. (Psychology Review)

Their papers

• A psychometric evaluation of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (2005) — 302 citations
• Examining the factor structure of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory with an Australian general population sample (2003) — 117 citations
• The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) — 604 citations
• Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers (2016) — 2,503 citations
• An examination of the factor structure of the schutte self-report emotional intelligence (SSREI) scale via confirmatory factor analysis (2005) — 135 citations
• Multi-factor modeling in individual differences research: Some recommendations and suggestions (2007) — 131 citations
• The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better (2016) — 207 citations
• The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data (2020) — 115 citations
• At what sample size do latent variable correlations stabilize? (2018) — 95 citations
• Brain volume and intelligence: The moderating role of intelligence measurement quality (2017) — 96 citations
• Raven's is not a pure measure of general intelligence: Implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g (2015) — 109 citations
• Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models: g as superordinate or breadth factor? (2008) — 159 citations