Matrix Analysis as a Complementary Analytic Strategy in Qualitative Inquiry
By J. Averill. Qualitative Health Research, 2002
740 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17fafa850eb1f997960992c97056be400d82ed0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Education
- D. Finfgeld-Connett
- Alison B. Hamilton
- Julie A. Marsh
- M. Bertrand
- Erin P. Finley
- Catriona Elek
- P. Danaher
- J. Page
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Qualitative Methods in Implementation Research: An Introduction (2019, methodology): “(2013) conducted pre-implementation interviews to inform the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies; interviews were summarized using a structured template aligned with the interview guide (Hamilton, 2013), and matrices were developed to be able to review at-a-glance the key informatio”
- Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews (2014, methodology): “Subsequent columns should be labeled using preliminarily identified codes, and extracted raw data (i.e. qualitative findings in the form of data segments) are then placed into these columns (Averill, 2002; Miles and Huberman, 1994) (see Table 1).”
- Teachers’ Sensemaking of Data and Implications for Equity (2015, methodology): “Our first matrix, created in Excel, included every instance of attribution—our unit of analysis—each of which was given one row, allowing us to analyze trends across cases (Averill, 2002).”