Lymph-Borne Chemokines and Other Low Molecular Weight Molecules Reach High Endothelial Venules via Specialized Conduits While a Functional Barrier Limits Access to the Lymphocyte Microenvironments…

By J. E. Gretz, C. Norbury, Arthur O. Anderson, A. Proudfoot, S. Shaw. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2000

614 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Lymph-borne, soluble factors (e.g., chemokines and others) influence lymphocyte recirculation and endothelial phenotype at high endothelial venules (HEVs) in lymph node cortex. Yet the route lymph-borne soluble molecules travel from the subcapsular sinus to the HEVs is unclear. Therefore, we injected subcutaneously into mice and rats a wide variety of fluorophore-labeled, soluble molecules and examined their distribution in the draining lymph nodes. Rather than percolating throughout the draining lymph node, all molecules, including microbial lipopolysaccharide, were very visible in the subcapsular and medullary sinuses but were largely excluded from the cortical lymphocyte microenvironments. Exclusion prevailed even during the acute lymph node enlargement accompanying viral infection. However, low molecular mass (MW) molecules, including chemokines, did gain entry into the cortex, but in a very defined manner. Low MW, fluorophore-labeled molecules highlighted the subcapsular sinus, the reticular fibers, and the abluminal and luminal surfaces of the associated HEVs. These low MW molecules were in the fibers of the reticular network, a meshwork of collagen fibers ensheathed by fibroblastic reticular cells that connects the subcapsular sinus floor and the HEVs by intertwining with their basement membranes. Thus, low MW, lymph-borne molecules, including chemokines, traveled rapidly from the subcapsular sinus to the HEVs using the reticular network as a conduit.

Subfields: Immunology, Immunology and Allergy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/163cf620e21c7d6806797f9c6690cc431af4b2d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

  1. J. Cyster
  2. A. Luster
  3. F. Batista
  4. Naomi E. Harwood
  5. Ulrich H. von Andrian
  6. T. Okada
  7. R. Mebius
  8. S. Luther

In Immunology and Allergy

  1. F. Batista
  2. Naomi E. Harwood
  3. J. Cyster
  4. M. Aurrand-Lions
  5. B. Imhof
  6. B. Hinz
  7. H. Wiig
  8. M. Swartz

Citations in the corpus