Response of chickpea genotypes to low temperature stress during reproductive development

By H. Clarke, Kadambot H. M. Siddique. 2004

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15e3b70eef6474c19f17b303d9c04086714d3b98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Chickpea molecular breeding: New tools and concepts (2006, background): “…at temperatures of 15 ◦C and below are documented from field in Australia (Siddique & Sedgley, 1986), the Mediterranean (Singh, 1993) and India (Savithri et al., 1980; Srinivasan et al., 1998), and in growth room studies (Srinivasan et al., 1999; Clarke & Siddique, 2004; Nayyar et al., 2005).”
Potential and limits of exploitation of crop wild relatives for pea, lentil, and chickpea improvement (2020, background): “In the relatively mild Australian winters, chickpea has a Mediterranean winter annual lifecycle and is often exposed to chilling temperatures at flowering that can delay podset for >1 month (Berger et al., 2004; Clarke & Siddique, 2004).”
Response of Chickpea Yield to High Temperature Stress during Reproductive Development (2006, background): “The plasticity of crop plants allows plants to compensate for part of the lost yield due to high temperature and drought stresses by adjusting yield components (Angadi et al., 2003; Clarke and Siddique, 2004 ).”
Sensitivity of flowering plant gametophytes to temperature fluctuations (2011, background): “At the post-anthesis level, pollen germination (Hedhly et al., 2005a; Kakani et al., 2002, 2005), pollen tube growth rate (Clarke and Siddique, 2004; Hedhly et al., 2004; Srinivasan et al., 1999), and pollen dynamics (Hedhly et al., 2005a) also show genotype-specific responses.”
Chickpea evolution has selected for contrasting phenological mechanisms among different habitats (2011, background): “…particularly sensitive to even moderate temperatures at flowering (daily mean temperature \ 16 C) (Srinivasan et al. 1998; Berger et al. 2004, 2005; Clarke and Siddique 2004; Nayyar et al. 2005), there is no advantage in flowering early when temperatures are low because of the low probability of…”
Productivity, sustainability, and rainfall-use efficiency in Australian rainfed Mediterranean agricultural systems (2005, unknown): “In chickpea, early flowering does not necessarily result in early podding because cool temperatures prevent fertilisation and pod development (Clarke and Siddique 2004), but early phenology characterised high productivity at sites suffering terminal drought even with delayed podding (Berger et al.”
Heat stress in grain legumes during reproductive and grain-filling phases (2017, background): “In many legumes, for example, chickpea (Clarke and Siddique 2004) and cowpea (Ahmed et al. 1992), pollen development is more sensitive to thermal stress than the female reproductive parts.”
Screening techniques and sources of resistance to abiotic stresses in cool-season food legumes (2006, unknown): “Temperatures below 15 ◦C cause damage, particularly to pollen tube growth in the style (Clarke & Siddique, 2004). There is genetic variation in chilling response, with some genotypes maintaining pod number even following a 5 ◦C event (Sandhu & ArasaKesary, 2003). In an innovative experiment, Clarke ”
Food crops face rising temperatures: An overview of responses, adaptive mechanisms, and approaches to improve heat tolerance (2016, background): “…at all stages, compared to the female gametophyte as reported in maize (Herrero & Johnson, 1980), cowpea (Ahmed, Hall, & DeMason, 1992), chickpea (Clarke & Siddique, 2004; Devasirvatham et al., 2012, 2013; Kaushal et al., Page 5 of 42 2013), rice (Sakata & Higashitani, 2008; Wassmann et…”
Chilling and Drought Stresses in Crop Plants: Implications, Cross Talk, and Potential Management Opportunities (2018, background): “The chilling stress in chickpea at reproductive stage led to flower abortion and poor pod setting (Clarke and Siddique, 2004; Nayyar et al., 2005).”
Pollen selection for chilling tolerance at hybridisation leads to improved chickpea cultivars (2004, methodology): “This temperature regime was chosen because the largest difference between chilling sensitive and chilling tolerant pollen tube growth in vivo is observed in the 7‐12 ◦ C range ( Clarke & Siddique, 2004 ).”
Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement (2004, unknown): “5a shows that CTS 60543, a genotype selected at ICRISAT for chilling tolerance at the reproductive stage (Clarke and Siddique 2004), could not be differentiated from the other accessions in terms of its relationship between flowering and the flowering–pod set interval at most sites.”
High temperature tolerance in chickpea and its implications for plant improvement (2012, background): “Most of the pollen studies in chickpea have focussed on cold tolerance (Srinivasan et al. 1999; Clarke et al. 2004) and the meiosis stage [9 days to 5–6 days before anthesis (DBA)] of chickpea was found to be sensitive to cold (<38C) (Clarke and Siddique 2004).”
Effect of varying high temperatures during reproductive growth on reproductive function, oxidative stress and seed yield in chickpea genotypes differing in heat sensitivity (2013, background): “2005 ) and parts of Western Australia (Clarke and Siddique 2004 ).”