Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement
By J. Berger, N. Turner, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, E. J. Knights, R. Brinsmead, I. Mock, C. Edmondson, T. Khan. 2004
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d28df01c0375d050a9a6600c8ceaa7d091bc4eb6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Plant Science
- P. Gaur
- Vincent Vadez
- Kadambot H. M. Siddique
- N. Turner
- J. Berger
- Afshin Soltani
- C. Coyne
- Jana Kholová
Citations in the corpus
- Chickpea evolution has selected for contrasting phenological mechanisms among different habitats (2011, methodology): “The CLIMA-ACIAR G 9 E trials used spatially optimized, randomised complete block designs (RCBD) with two and three replicates in India and Australia, respectively, with plot sizes varying from 4.8 to 17.1 m2 (details in (Berger et al. 2004, 2006)).”
- Potential and limits of exploitation of crop wild relatives for pea, lentil, and chickpea improvement (2020, background): “tures at flowering that can delay podset for >1 month (Berger et al., 2004; Clarke & Siddique, 2004).”
- Characterization of the main chickpea cropping systems in India using a yield gap analysis approach (2018, background): “…most of the chickpea production area in India is characterized by a late season water deficit which is usually referred to as the major chickpea production limiting factor in India and across the world (Soltani et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2014; Soltani and Sinclair, 2012a; Berger et al., 2004).”