Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socio-Economic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use - Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco

By J. Holtzclaw, R. Clear, H. Dittmar, D. Goldstein, P. Haas. 2002

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14abf6ca320a1d60c886c965ebc665526c32fcca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Travel and the Built Environment (2010, background): “…Hedel & Vance, 2007 German Mobility Panel Survey D LNR/PRR SE/OT no Hess et al., 1999 12 neighborhood commercial centers in Seattle, WA A LNR SE no Holtzclaw et al., 2002 Chicago, IL/Los Angeles, CA/San Francisco, CA A NLR SE no Joh et al., 2009 8 neighborhoods in southern CA D LNR SE/CR/AT yes…”
Urban Structure and Energy—A Review (2008, background): “It is worth noting that in those few US cities that do approach the 30 people/ha critical point postulated in Newman and Kenworthy (1989), studies have detected marginal effects of density on VKT (see Holtzclaw et al., 2002; Bento et al., 2003; Baum-Snow & Kahn, 2005; Golob & Brownstone, 2005).”
Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies (2006, background): “Holtzclaw et al (2002) recently studied travel behavior and car-ownership levels as functions of land-use and transit-accessibility characteristics of neighborhoods in three regions with LEM programs: Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.”
Urban Land Area and Population Growth: A New Scaling Relationship for Metropolitan Expansion (2007, background): “…usage and levels of walking and other exercise are proportional to population density (Ewing and Cervero, 2001; Frank et al., 2005; Frumpkin, 2002; Holtzclaw et al., 2002) but intake fraction is proportional to LPD, this would suggest that small-population, high-density urban areas such as Ames,…”
Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis (2002, unknown): “(Holtzclaw, 1994; Cervero and Gorham, 1995; Cervero, 1996; Schimek, 1996; Holtzclaw, et al., 2002 ).”
Alternative Modeling Approaches Used for Examining Automobile Ownership: A Comprehensive Review (2014, background): “The earlier literature has been focussed on examining car ownership at an aggregate level (Holtzclaw et al., 2002; Clark, 2007).”
A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels (2007, background): “A few recent attempts at shedding more light on this issue include the research of Hess and Ong, 2001, Bhat and Pulugurta, 1998, Holtzclaw et al., 2002, and Shay and Khattak, 2005).”
Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example (2013, background): “Holtzclaw et al. (2002) find that the average annual distance driven per car at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level is a strong function of density, income, household size and public transit.”
Cross-Sectional and Quasi-Panel Explorations of the Connection between the Built Environment and Auto Ownership (2007, background): “3 significantly correlated with neighborhood residential density, after accounting for average per capita income, average family size, and availability of public transit (Holtzclaw et al., 2000).”
The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile (2010, methodology): “Holtzclaw et al. (2002) use aggregate data from three U.S. cities to claim a universal influence of residential density (households per acre) on vehicle ownership and use.”