Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Travel and the Built Environment (2010, background): “…SE/AT yes Cervero, 2002a Montgomery County, MD D LGR SE/LS no Cervero, 2006 225 light rail transit stations in 11 metropolitan areas A LNR ST/LS no Cervero, 2007 26 TODs in five CA regions D LGR SE/ LS/WP/AT yes Cervero & Duncan, 2003 San Francisco Bay Area, CA D LGR SE/OT no Cervero & Duncan,…”
Maintaining diversity in America's transit-rich neighborhoods: tools for equitable neighborhood change (2010, background): “Cervero (2007), for example, concludes that a combination of a lifestyle preference for living near transit and public policies shape travel behavior in TODs (and, perhaps, TRNs).”
Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings (2009, methodology): “Cervero ( 2007 ) developed a two‐level nested logit model, with the upper level indicating the binary choice of residential location (whether or not to live within half a mile of a rail station) and the lower level representing the binary choice of commute mode (rail or auto).”
Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: an international review of empirical studies (2016, background): “The main goal of such policies is to encourage highdensity, mixed-use, pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly environments, in combination with improved transit systems to promote transit use (Bertolini, Curtis, & Renne, 2012; Cervero, 2007).”