Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis.

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. (2020, background): “…instruction to someone’s self-reported learn- ing style positively affects their ability to learn new information (e.g., Husmann & O’Loughlin, 2018; Knoll, Otani, Skeel, & Van Horn, 2017; Krätzig & Arbuthnott, 2006; Rogowsky, Calhoun, & Tallal, 2015; also see Pashler et al., 2008 for a review).”
Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment (2010, background): “Others (Kraetzig & Arbuthnott, 2006) argue that gender may not influence individual preferences.”
Neuromyths among Teachers and Student Teachers. (2015, unknown): “…Inventory; Barsch, 1991) have shown low Cronbach’s alpha (.54 for visual, .56 for auditory, and .38 for kinesthetic items) and failed to establish significant correlations between modality dominance and actual performance in visual, auditory, or tactile memory tests (Kratzig & Arbuthnott, 2006).”
Neuromythologies in education (2008, background): “They could be categorised into neuromyths where more is better: ‘If we can get more of the brain to ‘‘light up’’, then learning will improve . . .’, and neuromyths where specificity is better: ‘If we concentrate *Email: jgeake@brookes.ac.uk”