Neuromythologies in education

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Neuromyths among Teachers and Student Teachers. (2015, unknown): “3 Although several publications stress the presence of neuromyths in the field of education (e.g., Ansari & Coch, 2006; Geake, 2008; Goswami, 2006; Lindell & Kidd, 2011; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002; Pasquinelli, 2012; Tardif & Doudin, 2011), few studies have sought t”
What Makes Great Teaching? Review of the Underpinning Research. (2014, background): “…of learning styles by Riener and Willingham, 2010), but the psychological evidence is clear that there are no benefits for learning from trying to present information to learners in their preferred learning style (Pashler et al, 2008; Geake, 2008; Riener and Willingham, 2010; Howard-Jones, 2014).”