Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM

By T. Watson. 2010

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14174a0264c2996c991081de64259d116e1faf51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. C. Truss
2. Amanda Shantz
3. Emma Soane
4. Rick Delbridge
5. Kerstin Alfes

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Kerstin Alfes
2. Amanda Shantz
3. C. Truss
4. Emma Soane
5. Rick Delbridge
6. Arnold B. Bakker
7. Evangelia Demerouti
8. A. Saks

In Public Administration

1. Rick Delbridge
2. Kerstin Alfes

Citations in the corpus

• Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory (2011, background): “…within the discourse of what might be termed ‘positive HRM’, with its unitarist focus on how HRM can be harnessed to the benefit of individual and organisational performance, sidestepping the discipline’s traditional roots in the socialscientific study of organisational realities (Watson 2010).”