Workplace justice and the dilemma of organizational citizenship.

By Russell S. Cropanzano, Zinta S. Byrne. 2000

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/125685f27878755d11d293e9f31708373bc0f0a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. (2001, background): “Indeed, there is now considerable evidence suggesting that justice builds strong interpersonal bonds (Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000) and promotes cooperation (Tyler, 1999).”
The Benefits of Justice for Temporary Workers (2007, background): “Over the years, different scholars have operationalized social exchange relationships in sundry ways (for a review, see Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000).”
Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale (2013, background): “As a mechanism for facilitating social exchange (Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000), trust in the workplace impacts overall organisational functioning through its influence on relationship quality (Lau & Cobb, 2010; Tan & Lim, 2009).”
Understanding Social Loafing: The Role of Justice Perceptions and Exchange Relationships (2003, methodology): “After reviewing research on justice perceptions and several outcomes, Cropanzano and his colleagues (Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000; Cropanzano et al., 2001) suggested that close interpersonal relationships mediate the relationship between justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors, and…”
Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model† (2007, background): “The justice literature has embraced several indicators of social exchange, such as psychological contracts, leader–member exchange (LMX), commitment, support, and trust (e.g., Cohen-Charash & Spector, 2001; Colquitt et al., 2001; Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000; Konovsky, 2000).”
Perceived Support as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Justice and Trust (2006, background): “442”
Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. (2005, background): “…values of those superordinate entities (including governmental agencies) has also been shown to be important for increasing a wide variety of cooperative actions, ranging from participation in social activism and protests (Klandersman 2000) to organizational citizenship (Cropanzano & Byrne 2000).”
Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective (2008, background): “Also, with respect to the relational perspective, the MNM suggests that because justice facilitates the creation of strong interpersonal bonds (Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000) and encourages cooperation, justice can help to satisfy an individual’s need for belonging.”
Echoes of Silence: Employee Silence as a Mediator Between Overall Justice and Employee Outcomes (2012, background): “First, by emphasizing individuals’ perceptions across time and situations, entitybased overall justice perceptions are more stable and can provide a better indication of how employees generally behave (Cropanzano and Byrne 2000; Holtz and Harold 2009).”
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “For example, psychological contract breach is another plausible indicator of social exchange relationships that could be meta-analyzed once enough research has been conducted (Cropanzano & Byrne, 2000; Cropanzano, Rupp, et al., 2001; Robinson & Rousseau, 1994).”