Some historical and scientific issues related to research on emotional intelligence

By F. Landy. 2005

427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1213615756dddbcbd726d18b9c87084a30f9fc23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotional Intelligence in Organizations (2014, background): “Several researchers, however, have noted that the evidence that EI can be enhanced is scant (Landy 2005,Matthews et al. 2002, Schmit 2006), and some have questioned whether it is possible to develop EI (Hogan & Stokes 2006).”
Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A Critical Review (2006, background): “Argument 4: MI theory has been validated by its classroom applications. Chen (2004) claimed that “MI theory can also be validated by evaluating the results of applying the theory in a range of educational settings” (p.”
Emotional Intelligence and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis (2010, background): “Yet, there has been widespread skepticism of the link between EI and leadership outcomes (Antonakis, Ashkanasy, & Dasborough, 2009; Landy, 2005; Locke, 2005) and many studies have failed to find significant relationships between EI and transformational leadership in particular (e.g., Brown, Bryant,…”
Emotional intelligence and teacher burnout: A systematic review (2017, background): “Consequently, the heterogeneity of measures makes it difficult to synthesize the current understanding of research in this field (Landy, 2005; Mérida & Extremera, in press).”
Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. (2010, result): “This hypothesis contrasts with previous authors' suggestions of very little (if any) incremental validity of mixed EI over wellestablished personality and ability constructs (e.g., Landy, 2005).”
The impact of emotional intelligence on accuracy of self‐awareness and leadership performance (2011, neutral): “There is debate over the very existence of EI (Antonakis et al., 2009; Landy, 2005; Locke, 2005), how it is measured (Conte, 2005), and criticism/advocacy for particular models of EI (Ciarrochi et al., 2000; Daus and Ashkanasy, 2005; Mayer et al., 2008; Mayer et al., 2000).”
The mediating role of burnout on the relationship of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy with OCB and performance (2015, background): “This inconsistency has led some scholars to critique the scientific status of EI in organizational research (Becker, 2003; Landy, 2005).”
Personnel selection. (2008, background): “See Landy 2005, pp. 47–100 Johnson JW, Carter GW, Davison HK, Oliver DH. 2001.”
Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Intelligence, and Job Performance (2006, background): “Landy (2005) and Zeidner, Matthews, and Roberts (2004) argued against using emotional intelligence to predict job performance unless it makes an incremental linear contribution to prediction.”
Leader emergence: the role of emotional intelligence and motivation to lead (2011, background): “EI remains controversial with respect to both construct and criterion-related validity (Cherniss, 2010; Dulewicz and Higgs, 2000; Landy, 2005; Locke, 2005).”
Emotional Intelligence: Toward a Consensus of Models and Measures (2010, background): “One reason these models are considered problematic is that they tend to embrace so many different aspects of human performance that they lose meaning: They are essentially protean (Landy, 2005) and likely not falsifiable (Locke, 2005).”
Emotional Intelligence: Toward Clarification of a Concept (2010, background): “The first is to reject the concept of EI completely (Landy, 2005; Locke, 2005).”