Organizational Ambidexterity Through the Lens of Paradox Theory

By Angeliki Papachroni, Loizos Heracleous, Sotirios Paroutis. 2015

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/117554d7d62caccbca48eb7adbdca9a037b3f939

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. K. Mole
2. Andy Lockett
3. James C. Hayton
4. Nicos Nicolaou
5. Oksana Koryak
6. Matt C. Howard

In Strategy and Management

1. K. Mole
2. Andy Lockett
3. James C. Hayton
4. Nicos Nicolaou
5. Oksana Koryak
6. Mike Wright
7. José Chamoso Sánchez
8. Sylvia Maxfield

Citations in the corpus

• Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation (2018, background): “A more recent conceptualization of ambidexterity as a paradox (Jansen, 2008; Lewis, 2000; Papachroni et al., 2014) characterized by persistent tensions (Andriopoulos and Lewis, 2009) calls for a dynamic management of exploration-exploitation tensions (Smith, 2015).”