Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning

By Jonathan Evans, Jodie Curtis-Holmes. 2005

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, neutral): “…of extensive study in the cognitive science literature, and several formal models of how belief bias operates to disrupt syllogis-Richard tic reasoning have been proposed (De Neys, 2006; Evans & Curtis-Holmes, 2005; Evans & Feeney, 2004; Garnham & Oakhill, 2005; Klauer, Musch, & Naumer, 2000).”
A Dual Process Account of Creative Thinking (2011, positive): “Participants are more likely to rely upon type 1 thinking when time constraints are used (eg, Evans & Curtis-Holmes, 2005 ).”
On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning (2007, background): “Experimenters have predicted and observed that the size of biases attributed to heuristic processes are increased under such conditions, including both matching bias on the Wason selection task (Roberts & Newton, 2001 ) and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning (Evans & Curtis-Holmes, 2005 ).”
Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, background): “In reference to the finding that a speeded task increases belief bias in the study of Evans and Curtis-Holmes (2005), Evans (2007a, b) also noted that the Selective Processing Model proposes that the Type 2 component of belief bias causes the belief by logic interaction normally observed in…”
Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective (2010, methodology): “Evans and Curtis-Holmes (2005) used a speeded task method in which participants were required to respond in less than half the time they would normally take.”
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. (2008, result): “These accounts are supported by evidence of a shift from logical to belief-based reasoning under severe time pressure (Evans & Curtis-Holmes 2005) and under concurrent working memory load (De Neys 2006).”
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, neutral): “As noted above, Kruglanski and Gigerenzer (2011) claimed that research in the belief bias paradigm simply shows rule conflict and provides no evidence for dual processing.”