Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation

By Violina P. Rindova, Ian O. Williamson, Antoaneta P. Petkova, J. M. Sever. 2005

1,605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10c169b103235401f0f5aa0663a8d0c621fd2ad2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions, and Competitive Advantage. (2010, background): “a resource that is intimately path dependent (Fombrun, 2001; Rindova et al., 2005).”
The Impact of Corporate Reputation and Reputation Damaging Events on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Literature (2015, background): “…reputation is multidimensional, reflecting the aggregate perceptions of a firm’s stakeholders on financial and nonfinancial aspects (Fombrun, 1996, Rindova et al., 2005, 2010), and that it allows potentially significant competitive advantage for firms with higher reputation (Fombrun and Shanley,…”
Character, Conformity, or the Bottom Line? How and Why Downsizing Affected Corporate Reputation (2009, background): “3 The reputation literature also describes other perspectives and mechanisms, notably those that emphasize the quality of a firm’s external associations and those that suggest prominence and visibility are important components of reputation (Deephouse, 2000; Rindova et al., 2005).”
How firms respond to financial restatement : CEO successors and external reactions (2014, methodology): “Most research has argued that the reputation of a firm is a somewhat stable characteristic for it (Fombrun, 1996; Rindova et al., 2005), but recent scholarship has shown that a firm’s reputation can change quickly when unfavorable information is revealed or if the firm becomes associated with…”
THE PRODUCTION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITY: A CONSTRUCTIVIST PERSPECTIVE (SUMMARY) (2010, background): “Prior research has indicated that social ties and reputation are likely to be infl uential factors in the entrainment of stakeholders (Reynolds and Miller, 1992; Rindova et al., 2005; Dew et al., 2008; Sarasvathy et al., 2008).”
Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility? The Role of Institutions, Information, and Legitimacy (2010, background): “Symbolic conformity is most closely aligned to the institutional viewpoint described by Rindova et al. (2005) and the general perspective we adopt in this study.”
Organizational Reputation: A Review (2011, background): “Examining corporate recruiter ratings of U.S. schools of business, studies showed that a school’s overall reputation was positively related to prominence perceptions by raters (Boyd et al., 2010), and in turn to higher starting salaries among MBA graduates (Boyd et al., 2010; Rindova et al., 2005).”
Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation (2014, background): “, Baum and Oliver, 1991; King, Lenox, and Terlaak, 2005; Terlaak and King, 2006), placement in certification contests (Rao, 1994), media rankings (Rindova et al., 2005; Wade et al., 2006), and hiring of prestigious executives and directors (Chen, Hambrick, and Pollock, 2008) have all been shown to r”