A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably?

By J. Cranford, P. Shrout, Masumi Iida, Eshkol Rafaeli, T. Yip, N. Bolger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2006

841 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1097643854b80a4d3455152717bc0cf8ab82567c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Prospective Relationship between Negative Affective Reactivity to Daily Stress and Depressive Symptoms (2011, methodology): “78 for PA and nA, respectively (Cranford et al., 2006).”
Diary Studies in Organizational Research: An Introduction and Some Practical Recommendations (2010, background): “While in other areas of psychology , mood trajectories over the course of one or several weeks have already attracted some research attention (Cranford et al., 2006; Krohne, Egloff, Kohlmann, & Tausch, 1996), in work and organizational psychology such research is still in its infancy (Fuller et…”
The construct validity of vigor and its antecedents: A qualitative study (2009, neutral): “This POMS factor was subsequently re-validated (Cranford et al., 2006).”
WeeKends, WorK, and Well-Being: PsyChologiCal need satisfaCtions and day of the WeeK effeCts on mood, vitality, and PhysiCal symPtoms (2010, methodology): “Contemporary psychological research supports the existence of weekly cyclicity in mood (Cranford et al., 2006).”
Assessing Mood in Daily Life Structural Validity, Sensitivity to Change, and Reliability of a Short-Scale to Measure Three Basic Dimensions of Mood (2007, background): “Yet, the within-person variance has often been ignored (for exceptions see e.g., Buse & Pawlik, 1996, 2001; Cranford et al., 2006; Schimmack, 2003; Zelinski & Larsen, 2000; Zevon & Tellegen, 1982).”
Differences in the Between–Person and Within–Person Structures of Affect Are A Matter of Degree (2015, background): “This raises the question on how to assess affect in daily life more generally, and some solutions were already provided (Cranford et al., 2006; Wilhelm & Schoebi, 2007).”
Measuring People Intensively (2009, methodology): “Cranford et al. (2006) outline a procedure for examining the reliability of the IRM-NS scores using a generalizability theory framework.”
Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. (2012, methodology): “Approaches to assessing between-person and within-person reliabilities in ESM measures have been based on generalizability theory (Cranford et al., 2006), latent-state latent-trait theory (Courvoisier, Eid, Lischetzke, & Schreiber, 2010; Steyer, Schmitt, & Eid, 1999; Wilhelm & Schoebi, 2007), and wi”
The effect of positive work reflection during leisure time on affective well-being: Results from three diary studies (2016, methodology): “Following Cranford et al. (2006), we used three items (sad, hopeless, and discouraged).”
Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence. (2007, background): “The Profile of Mood States is a well-validated measure of mood, and it has been shown to reliably detect stress-related changes within persons in a range of moods, including anxiety, depression, anger, fatigue, and vigor (Cranford et al., 2006).”
Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement (2012, background): “This is in contrast with the findings of Cranford et al. (2006) who found that vigor – one of the dimensions of engagement – had a curvilinear effect throughout the week.”