Stance and voice in written academic genres

By L. Hamp-Lyons. 2014

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/103fa72222e03b5ffc03517c01e0a95b975937a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Ken Hyland
2. Feng Kevin Jiang

In Language and Linguistics

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Douglas Biber
4. Jim McKinley
5. Shih-Chieh Chien
6. A. Molino
7. R. Ruegg
8. Shulin Yu

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Raffaella Negretti
4. Douglas Biber
5. A. Molino
6. Jim McKinley
7. Shih-Chieh Chien
8. Paul Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing (2015, methodology): “Hunston and Thompson, 2000; Hyland and Guinda, 2012). A variety of linguistic features have been examined under these headings for the role they play in this persuasive activity, and analysts of academic writing have come to regard hedges, reporting verbs, directives, tense and so on as among a wide”