Young Children's Motivational Frameworks and Math Achievement: Relation to Teacher-Reported Instructional Practices, but Not Teacher Theory of Intelligence.
By Daeun Park, Elizabeth A. Gunderson, Eli Tsukayama, Susan C. Levine, Sian L. Beilock. 2016
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/102b7752d5fd0ff10957910b957d0cbe8fff07a6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Erin A. Maloney
- Susan C. Levine
- Elizabeth A. Gunderson
- Sian L. Beilock
- Daeun Park
- Gerardo Ramirez
- K. Stoehr
- Jenessa R. Shapiro
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Reciprocal relations among motivational frameworks, math anxiety, and math achievement in early elementary school (2018, methodology): “The data were collected as part of a larger study of academic achievement and emotions in first and second graders (Maloney et al., 2015; Park et al., 2016).”
- The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: a circumplex approach (2020, unknown): “…and growth mindset separately as predictors of (de) motivating teaching, as they were only slightly negatively correlated, in contrast to previous research combining fixed and growth mindset in an overall score based on large negative correlations between the measures (e.g., Park et al. 2016a).”