Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach

By P. Briñol, Richard E. Petty. 2009

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f148fae2e34486d9de3a23bccbb22724b963009

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. E. Michael Nussbaum
2. Doug Lombardi
3. Sally D. Farley
4. Kenneth G. DeMarree
5. Gale M. Sinatra

In Social Psychology

1. Doug Lombardi
2. E. Michael Nussbaum
3. Gale M. Sinatra
4. A. Sprenger
5. Bradley J. Stastny
6. R. Hartman
7. Sally D. Farley
8. N. Dieckmann

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Gale M. Sinatra
2. Doug Lombardi
3. E. Michael Nussbaum
4. Sally D. Farley
5. Kenneth G. DeMarree

Citations in the corpus

• Plausibility Judgments in Conceptual Change and Epistemic Cognition (2016, background): “Credibility, particularly the credibility of an information source, has been widely examined in social psychology research, specifically in terms of its relationship on persuasion (see, e.g., Bri~nol & Petty, 2009).”
• Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale (2017, background): “© 2017 Taylor & Francis perceived source credibility can act as a heuristic, a biasing agent, or a determinant of careful thought, among other possible roles (for reviews, see Briñol & Petty, 2009; Petty & Briñol, 2014).”
• Is gossip power? The inverse relationships between gossip, power, and likability (2011, background): “The elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) has provided some insight into how the sources of these “messages” influence attitudes about the target persons (Briñol & Petty, 2009).”