Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale
By R. Hartman, N. Dieckmann, A. Sprenger, Bradley J. Stastny, Kenneth G. DeMarree. 2017
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4629e8104652ebac2ca768b3c64a7ddfe59117b2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Chris G. Sibley
- Marc S. Wilson
- Petar Milojev
- T. Milfont
- Lara M. Greaves
- N. Overall
- F. Barlow
- Danny Osborne
Citations in the corpus
- An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes (2020, unknown): “ods as possessing low credibility (Hartman et al., 2017), with a preference”
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. (2020, background): “…their trust in the police, general police engagement (i.e., intentions to report suspicious activity; Tyler, 2005), trust in politicians, trust in science (Hartman et al., 2017; Nisbet et al., 2015), vaccination attitudes (Lee et al., 2017), and belief in conspiracy theories (Lantian et al., 2016).”