Plausibility Judgments in Conceptual Change and Epistemic Cognition

By Doug Lombardi, E. Michael Nussbaum, Gale M. Sinatra. 2016

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6c3ff3a398c35168a14d86ad689a995670634de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Doug Lombardi
2. Gale M. Sinatra
3. E. Michael Nussbaum
4. Stella Vosniadou
5. Suzanne H. Broughton
6. Lucia Mason
7. Patricia A. Alexander
8. Christina Stathopoulou

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Doug Lombardi
2. Gale M. Sinatra

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Doug Lombardi
2. Gale M. Sinatra

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments (2020, methodology): “Individuals may be motivated toward accepting this nonscientific explanation because of political party affiliation support of unregulated human activities, which could increase the plausibility of this alternative explanation (Lombardi et al., 2016).”