Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice
By D. Kirby. 2006
420 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ef68edd15c3087754ff8a3d43eb3467341a909e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- David Urbano
- João J. M. Ferreira
- Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues
- Mário Lino Barata Raposo
- C. Blanka
- Pablo D'Este
- Arminda Maria Finisterra do Paço
- Samantha R. Bradley
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Alain Fayolle
- Magnus Klofsten
- F. Liñán
- V. Grinevich
- M. Abreu
In Strategy and Management
- David Urbano
- Markus Perkmann
- Maribel Guerrero
- Christopher S. Hayter
- M. Abreu
- V. Grinevich
- Magnus Klofsten
- Pelin Demirel
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurial intentions: is education enough? (2013, background): “According to this theory, individuals will stimulate their entrepreneurial potential if they accept it as true that they have the ability, that there are environmental possibilities and that there is social support (Kirby 2006).”
- Behaviours and entrepreneurial intention: Empirical findings about secondary students (2011, methodology): “The TBP has been used by several researchers as a framework to explore attitudes towards EI (Linan and Chen 2009; North 1990; Kirby 2006; Miller et al. 2009; Schwarz et al. 2009; Turker and Selcuk 2008).”
- Entrepreneurial Universities (2013, background): “In the literature of entrepreneurial universities, six theoretical models attempt to explain this phenomenon (Clark, 1998; Guerrero & Urbano, 2012; Kirby, 2006; O’Shea et al., 2005; O’Shea et al., 2007; Rothaermel, Agung, & Jiang, 2007; Sporn, 2001).”
- Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities (2016, background): “In relation to the regulative dimension, the literature on research commercialisation highlights the positive effects of having in place formal mechanisms and structures such as technology transfer offices (TTOs), intellectual property rights protection (IP) and incentive measures (O’Shea et al. 200”
- Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: an individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (2013, background): “(2011) and the success criteria for entrepreneurial universities questionnaire developed by Kirby et al. (2011). During the academic period 2008–2009, an online questionnaire was administrated to 3,438 academics enrolled in business and engineering schools from some public Spanish universities.”
- Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework (2008, background): “For example, Kirby (2006) posits that universities need to go beyond putting short-term initiatives in place and build an entrepreneurial culture whereby commercialization activity is encouraged and entrepreneurial behavior runs through the whole organization.”
- The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges (2019, background): “Informal factors are favourable attitudes of students and faculty toward entrepreneurship (Liñán et al. 2011), adequate ways of teaching (Kirby (2005), the presence of entrepreneurial role models (Venkataraman, 2004), and appropriate reward system for being an (academic) entrepreneur (Landry et al.…”
- The Relationship Between University Support to Entrepreneurship with Entrepreneurial Activity in Spain: A Gem Data Based Analysis (2008, background): “Universities are being required to operate in a more entrepreneurial way, commercialising the results of their research and spinning out knowledge-based enterprises ( Kirby 2006 ).”
- Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “About a year later, Kirby (2006) offered a model of seven strategic actions for the development of an enterprising university.”
- Industry placement, authentic experience and the development of venturing and technology self-efficacy (2009, background): “…part driven and supported by programmes such as Science Enterprise Challenge, for universities to offer both curriculum- (education/degree-focussed) and non-curriculum-based (focussed on enterprise) activities to undergraduate and postgraduate students in SET (Galloway and Brown 2002, Kirby 2006).”
- Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “capabilities by supporting recruitment and training of technology transfer staff (Woolgar 2007; Kirby 2006).”
- Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, positive): “A university’s culture must encourage and enable academicians and students to commercialize their inventions and intellectual property, and entrepreneurship should become an integral part of university missions (Kirby, 2006).”
- An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: a review and ways forward (2019, methodology): “…by their broad mindset, enabling them to cooperate and generate ideas across organizational boundaries, the culture needed is defined by trial and error, an innovative mindset and opportunities for experimenting and continuous refinement (Hagedorn and Jamieson 2014; Kirby 2006; Menzel et al.”