Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework

By Rory O’Shea, H. Chugh, Thomas J. Allen. 2008

505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4ae4205bc17d7eefe7504d66fdecdeaa69de4f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies (2014, background): “…creating employment in science-based sectors (Conceicao et al., 2011; Breznitz and Anderson, 2006; Clarysse et al., 2005; Di Gregorio and Shane, 2003; O'Shea et al., 2008; Shane, 2004; Slater and Mohr, 2006), and in providing a link between industry and science (Debacker and Veugelers, 2005; Perez…”
“To have and have not”: founders’ human capital and university start-up survival (2013, background): “…literature surveys on academic entrepreneurship and on research-based spin-off companies (Helm and Mauroner 2007; Rothaermel et al. 2007; Djokovic and Souitaris 2008; O’Shea et al. 2008) where no studies that assess the relationship between founders’ human capital and firm survival are found.”
Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities (2010, background): “Research shows that, within the university, there are important institutional underpinnings for building commercial linkages that are related to outputs such as patents, licensing revenue, and startup formation (Link and Siegel 2007; O’Shea et al. 2008; Ponomariov 2008).”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, unknown): “…beyond those provided by universities— such as science parks (Link and Scott 2005; Zou and Zhao 2014), incubators, service providers (Rasmussen et al. 2006), and other forms of entrepreneurial support (O’Shea et al. 2008; Powers and McDougall 2005a)—can be helpful to early-stage spinoffs.”
From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society (2012, background): “In an effort to stem the tide and ultimately win the Second World War, the United States Government turned to a number of American colleges and universities to produce innovative technological based weapon systems.”
Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison (2011, unknown): “In recent years the Bayh-Dole (BD) Act and its effect on uniersity technology transfer and university-based entrepreneurship as received increasing attention from both academics interested n technology policy and policy-makers (for excellent summaries, ee Rothaermel et al., 2007; O’Shea et al., 2008”
Valuing University–Based Firms: The Effects of Academic Affiliation on IPO Performance (2011, result): “This definition is in keeping with the literature (Colombo, Mustar, & Wright, 2010; Lockett et al., 2005; O’Shea et al., 2008; Rothaermel et al., 2007; Shane, 2004; Shane & Stuart, 2002).”
Completing the technology transfer process: M&As of science-based IPOs (2012, unknown): “…firms are defined as companies that either were developed by faculty members based on their own research or were created specifically to capitalize on academic research.1 This definition is consistent with the literature (Shane 2004; O’ Shea et al. 2008; Colombo et al. 2010; Bonardo et al. 2011).”