Efficacy-Performance Spirals: An Empirical Test

By Christine M. Shea, Jane M. Howell. 2000

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d0883a8c330d5b093afc40dbaba19c9a9dc1c33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife (2010, background): “Spirals of efficacy beliefs, engagement, and performance Past research has suggested that a positive gain spiral of self-efficacy and performance exists; selfefficacy enhances performance, which – in its turn – increases efficacy beliefs (Lindsley et al., 1995; Shea & Howell, 2000).”
Sticking it All Together: A Critical Assessment of the Group Cohesion–Performance Literature (2009, unknown): “The reciprocal and positive relationship between efficacy and performance is well established (Lindsley et al. 1995; Shea and Howell 2000).”
A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (2013, background): “…articles argue that PLS supports causal modeling (Birkinshaw, Hood, & Jonsson, 1998; Cool, Dierickx, & Jemison, 1989; Delios & Beamish, 1999; Johansson & Yip, 1994; Shea & Howell, 2000), and some researchers have the misconception that using PLS avoids inconsistent and biased parameter estimates.”
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: the Turkish case (2010, background): “Self-efficacybeliefis the focal point for social learning theorythat explains the individual behaviour through the mutual cause-effect relationship among personal characteristics, environmental factors and behaviour (Chen et al. 1998; Shea and Howell 2000; Hartsfield 2003).”
I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance (2018, background): “Some researchers argue that cross-sectional relationships reflect the influence of performance on subsequent self-efficacy, not the reverse (Shea & Howell, 2000; Vancouver et al., 2001).”
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. (2007, background): “Other research has shown that cognitive ability (e.g., Phillips & Gully, 1997) and experience (e.g., Shea & Howell, 2000) are positive predictors of self-efficacy.”
PLS, Small Sample Size, and Statistical Power in MIS Research (2006, background): “In fact, only two articles (one in Management and one in Marketing) used PLS in these six journals during this four year period, and both of those cited MIS authors when they justified using PLS ([18] cited [1]; [19] cited [5]).”