A capability-based view of competitive heterogeneity
By David G. Hoopes, Tammy L. Madsen. 2008
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bfca6b078f02734fa3f46aa3046d268daac2428
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- N. J. Foss
- Paul Louis Drnevich
- Patrick Mikalef
- David C. Croson
- Koen H. Heimeriks
- Teppo Felin
- Aard J. Groen
- Tammy L. Madsen
In Strategy and Management
- N. J. Foss
- Patrick Mikalef
- Teppo Felin
- John Krogstie
- Koen H. Heimeriks
- Aard J. Groen
- Jeroen Kraaijenbrink
- John-Christopher Spender
Citations in the corpus
- Information Technology and Business-Level Strategy: Toward an Integrated Theoretical Perspective (2013, result): “Such an approach is wholly consistent with prior theory development in the RBV on firms' demand for complementarity between resources and capabilities (Hoopes and Madsen 2008; Hoopes et al. 2003; Makadok 2001; Winter 2003).”
- Does the Diversification–Firm Performance Relationship Change Over Time? A Meta‐Analytical Review (2018, unknown): “Underlying this argument is the conviction that firms differ from one another in terms of their resources, capabilities and other firm-specific factors (Adner and Helfat, 2003; Hoopes and Madsen, 2008).”
- Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda (2017, background): “It is generally agreed that capabilities operate quite differently from one another, and result in varying levels of competitive advantage and firm performance based on a number of internal and external factors (Hoopes and Madsen 2008).”
- Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure (2012, methodology): “Our purpose is to anchor and build on the more common definitions rather than to provide an exhaustive review (for recent reviews, see Becker, 2004; Cohen et al., 1996; Di Stefano et al., 2010; Hoopes and Madsen, 2008).”
- Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders (2016, background): “Besides a stakeholder's status, other elements such as size (Mishra & Shah, 2009), ownership structure (Hoopes & Madsen, 2008), or even social class (Hart & Sharma, 2004) might learn its potential to capture value and required capabilities, which offer interesting paths for further research.”
- The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques (2010, background): “Such work, and that of Hoopes, Madsen, and Walker (2003); Hoopes and Madsen (2008); and Peteraf and Barney (2003), calls on the “value–price–cost framework” (Anderson & Narus, 1998; Tirole, 1988).”