The Organizational and Social Foundations of Worker Resistance
By Vincent J. Roscigno, Randy Hodson. 2004
210 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8403cfb711aaa5b5cd7fcdc7c2d280747d29dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- The job demands–resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect (2011, background): “Recent research (Roscigno & Hodson, 2004 ; Spector et al, 2006 ), however, has shown that there may be differences in the antecedents of the different facets of CWB.”
- The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox (2011, background): “…configurations that scored significantly higher or lower on team innovation and team processes than the average score of all other configurations (Fiss, 2007; Roscigno & Hodson, 2004), we created a dummy variable for each configuration wherein 1 represents teams included in the configuration.”
- Workplace Dignity: Communicating Inherent, Earned, and Remediated Dignity (2015, unknown): “Another response to dignity threats is engaging in resistance, such as absenteeism, labour organizing, striking, sabotage, and quitting (Cleaveland, 2005; Hodson, 2001; Roscigno and Hodson, 2004; Stuesse, 2010).”
- The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? (2006, methodology): “Spector and Fox (2003) factor analyzed the subscale and further divided it into two factors: Upset consisting of angry, anxious, depressed, discouraged, fatigued, frightened, furious, and gloomy, and Bored which consisted of a single item.”
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2020, background): “Workers under regimes of technical and bu-reaucratic control have long organized to protect their rights (e.g., Cutcher-Gershenfeld & Kochan, 2004; Kellogg, 2011; Roscigno & Hodson, 2004).”
- A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations (2007, methodology): “tistical procedures, as done by Roscigno and Hodson (2004). For example, the researcher may use set-theoretic analysis to identify con figurations and then test the relationship be tween these configurations and performance using f-tests or OLS.”