Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corporate social responsibility practice and corporate financial performance: evidence from Nigeria companies (2015, methodology): “Most measures of CSR are based on an index (Crisóstomo et al., 2011; Uwuigbe and Egbide, 2012), while measure of financial performance is also a multi-faceted phenomenon and divided into three broad categories: investor-based, accounting-based and market-based measures (Orlitzky et al.”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “The last category involves the role of a firm’s primary stakeholders in predicting CSR activities as in consumer perceptions of the level of CSR importance (e.g. Christmann and Taylor 2006), and other stakeholder groups such as business–NGO alliances (e.g. Jamali and Keshishian 2009).”
Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India (2014, background): “Crisóstomo et al. (2011) argued that spending resources on CSR can only be justi ﬁ ed to the shareholders and creditors by excess cash ﬂ owsarisingfromhigherportability.”
An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Moderating Effects of CEO Power and Ownership Structure: A Case Study of the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan (2019, background): “A study conducted in Brazil indicated that CSR has a significant negative correlation with FP [93].”