Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time.
By Judith M. Harackiewicz, K. Barron, J. Tauer, S. M. Carter, A. Elliot. 2000
942 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0814c9b9ca249fe109a505ed609c40ec365aeb7e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Chris S. Hulleman
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Kou Murayama
- Corwin Senko
- Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Jianzhong Xu
- Suzanne Hidi
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- A. Elliot
- Chris S. Hulleman
- Kou Murayama
- Allan Wigfield
- Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Corwin Senko
In Safety Research
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Chris S. Hulleman
- A. Elliot
- Suzanne Hidi
- Andrew J. Howell
- Corwin Senko
- K. Ann Renninger
- Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink
Citations in the corpus
- A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. (2009, background): “Because students with mastery goals tend to focus on self-referent standards and the controllability and positive value of learning, we anticipated a positive relationship with enjoyment and a negative relationship with boredom (Daniels et al., 2008; Harackiewicz et al., 2000; Pekrun et al., 2006).”
- The relation between achievement goal and expectancy-value theories in predicting achievement-related outcomes: A test of four theoretical conceptions (2013, background): “…this integrative approach may contribute to clarity and parsimony in motivational theories, as expectancy-value variables and achievement goals may play complementary roles in predicting achievement-related outcomes (Harackiewicz and Linnenbrink 2005; Hulleman et al. 2008; Pintrich 2003b).”
- Math Achievement in Early Adolescence (2009, background): “In contrast, students’ mastery goal orientation has been linked to adaptive educational beliefs and behaviors (e.g., Ames & Archer, 1988; Harackiewicz et al., 2000), but its association with early adolescents’ school grades has been found nonsignificant or positive, yet weak (e.g., Wentzel, 1998,…”
- College Students' Goal Orientations and Achievement (2005, background): “However, recently researchers in the area of motivation have found that performance-approach goals are associated with higher grades (Church, Elliot, & Gable, 2001; Harackiewicz, Barron, Elliot, Carter, & Thrash, 1997; Harackiewicz, Barron,Tauer, Carter, & Elliot, 2000 ) and are not associated with”
- Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students achievement goals (2011, background): “Many studies measured only mastery goals and performance approach goals (e.g., Barron & Harackiewicz, 2001; Daniels et al., 2008; Harackiewicz et al., 2000), some measured a different third variable, such as work avoidance (e.g., Meece & Holt, 1993; Tapola & Niemivirta, 2008), and others used very…”
- Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions (2011, positive): “…concepts), navigate decisional conflict well, experience positive emotion, and perceive tasks as valuable (e.g., Darnon, Butera, & Harackiewicz, 2007; Harackiewicz, Barron, Tauer, Carter, & Elliot, 2000; Karabenick, 2003; Levy, Kaplan, & Patrick, 2004; Pekrun, Elliot, & Maier, 2006; Wolters, 2004).”