A stage model of academic spin-off creation
By Frédéric Nlemvo Ndonzuau, Fabrice Pirnay, B. Surlemont. 2002
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07df66a0ebd9f7aa200cdfd7a51f74ed0765c5bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Arne Isaksen
- Andrew J. Nelson
- Stephanie Zayed
- Alan C. O’Connor
- Michaela Trippl
- Réjean Landry
- Nabil Amara
In Strategy and Management
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Michaela Trippl
- Nabil Amara
- Réjean Landry
- Andrew J. Nelson
- Arne Isaksen
- Stephanie Zayed
- Alan C. O’Connor
Citations in the corpus
- Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities (2006, background): “Ndonzuau et al. (2002) claim that the formation of spin-offs needs to be understood as part of multi-stage processes.”
- “To have and have not”: founders’ human capital and university start-up survival (2013, background): “…characteristics and typology of USU (see Mustar et al. 2006 and Criaco et al. forthcoming for a survey), on their creation determinants (e.g. Ndonzuau et al. 2002; Di Gregorio and Shane 2003; Link and Scott 2005; Lockett and Wright 2005; Fini et al. 2009) or on the links between USU and the…”
- Exogenously Led and Policy-Supported New Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes (2017, background): “Emergence of new industries in a region may also be research driven through commercialization of research results, for example, through academic spin-offs (Ndonzuau, Pirnay, and Surlemont 2002).”
- Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework (2008, background): “In contrast, some cultural factors such as the ‘publish or perish’ drive, the ambiguous relationship of researchers to money, and the ‘disinterested’ nature of academic research to industry are seen as inhibitors to the valorization process of academic research (Ndonzuau et al. 2002).”
- Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “More commonly, articles use various measures of development, especially developmental frameworks, to proxy spinoff outcomes (Degroof and Roberts 2004; Johansson et al. 2005; Ndonzuau et al. 2002; Pirnay et al. 2003; Rasmussen and Borch 2010; Salvador 2011; van Geenhuizen and Soetanto 2009).”
- University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Development stages have been defined with reference to start-up date (Clarysse and Moray, 2004), main business activities (Ndonzuau et al., 2002), and critical resources needed (Sine et al., 2003; Wright et al., 2004b).”