Exogenously Led and Policy-Supported New Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes

By Arne Isaksen, Michaela Trippl. 2017

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3755c1047e4f9d4bcbcaaaf037ebcd27690889c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis (2020, background): “They can play a powerful role in framing regional policy issues through careful storytelling and mobilising legitimacy and resources for new regional initiatives, drawing on both regional and extra-regional resources (Isaksen and Trippl, 2017).”
Exogenous sources of regional industrial change (2018, background): “…creation in peripheral areas, arguing that the absence of a critical mass of strong actors may offer geographical niches for new paths and room for experimentation (Simmie, 2012) and underlining the importance of exogenous stimuli (Varis et al., 2014; Virkkala, 2007; Isaksen and Trippl, 2016b).”
Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development (2019, background): “In the present paper, we follow Isaksen and Trippl (2016) and others and use the notion of ‘new path development’ as an umbrella term for various forms of the rise of new economic activities in regions.”
The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline (2019, background): “Isaksen and Trippl (2016) distinguish between organizationally thick and diversified systems, organizationally thick and specialized systems and organizationally thin systems.”
A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research (2017, background): “The literature on regional innovation systems (RISs) has grown impressively in the last two decades (Asheim & Gertler, 2005; Asheim, Grillitsch, & Trippl, 2017; Cooke, Heidenreich, & Braczyk, 2004; Doloreux, 2002; Isaksen & Trippl, 2016; Tödtling & Trippl, 2005).”
Rural–Urban Linkages and Sustainable Regional Development: The Role of Entrepreneurs in Linking Peripheries and Centers (2016, background): “Other evidence suggests that completely different knowledge (especially analytic, synthetic) is acquired through exogenous sources [52].”
Regional worlds: from related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks (2020, background): “In all these regions, the role of exogenous sources and actors in GPN is much more critical in new path development (e.g., Barratt & Ellem, 2019; Dawley, 2014; Dawley et al., 2019; Fuller & Phelps, 2018; Harris, 2020; Isaksen & Trippl, 2017; Kleibert, 2016; Pickles et al., 2016).”