Evolutionary Social Psychology
By D. Kenrick, Jon K. Maner, Norman P. Li. 2010
509 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07208a02a892d0c4c60d1d8f43838106c9a0b042
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- H. T. Reis
- Eliot R. Smith
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Gün Refik Semin
- Shelly L. Gable
- Priyanka Joshi
- Shaul Shalvi
- Michel J. J. Handgraaf
In Social Psychology
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Lindred L. Greer
- H. T. Reis
- Shelly L. Gable
- C. D. De Dreu
- Gün Refik Semin
- Eliot R. Smith
- Nir Halevy
In Sociology and Political Science
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Lindred L. Greer
- C. D. De Dreu
- Adam D. Galinsky
- Nir Halevy
- Eileen Y. Chou
- Shaul Shalvi
- Michel J. J. Handgraaf
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-Analysis of Menstrual Cycle Effects on Women’s Mate Preferences (2014, background): “Therefore, women, who bear the greater cost of reproduction, would gain fitness from discriminating choice of mates (Buss & Schmitt, 2011; Kenrick et al., 2005).”
- Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis (2011, background): “influential persons and high quality resources (Geary et al., 2003; Kendrick et al., 2005).”
- SOCIALLY SITUATED COGNITION IN PERSPECTIVE (2013, background): “Smith and Collins (2009) recently described a specific application of collective search in their Distributed Social Cognition (DSC) model.”
- Good News! Capitalizing on Positive Events in an Interpersonal Context (2010, background): “It is widely believed that social acceptance had significant implications for survival and reproduction over evolutionary time (Buss & Kenrick, 1998).”
- A functional model of hierarchy (2011, background): “, & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power.”
- Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism (2011, background): “Results range from very weak (1) to very strong (5) (displayed ± SE).”