Meta-Analysis of Menstrual Cycle Effects on Women’s Mate Preferences
By Wendy Wood, Laura M. Kressel, Priyanka Joshi, B. Louie. 2014
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd86de813cf8d34b1170b8473c4c685455177d53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- D. Puts
- Elizabeth G. Pillsworth
- Lisa L. M. Welling
- M. Haselton
- R. Burriss
- Steven W. Gangestad
- David M. Buss
- D. Schmitt
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Elizabeth G. Pillsworth
- M. Haselton
- D. Puts
- Lisa L. M. Welling
- R. Burriss
- Steven W. Gangestad
- D. Schmitt
- David M. Buss
Citations in the corpus
- How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications (2016, background): “As noted by Gildersleeve et al. (2014a) and Wood et al. (2014), window sizes have varied; 6–9 days are most common.”