Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A CLOSER LOOK AT GRIT AND LANGUAGE MINDSET AS PREDICTORS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT (2020, background): “Consistent with the qualitative study byMercer andRyan (2009), some researchers have treated fixed and growth mindsets as separate factors not as two ends of a continuum (e.g., Bodill & Roberts, 2013; Bråten & Strømsø, 2004, 2005; Chen & Pajares, 2010; Dai & Cromley, 2014).”
Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention (2016, unknown): “…class rank (on grades: Martin, Montgomery, & Saphian, 2006; on retention: Brown, Lent, & Larkin, 1989), tests of deductive reasoning (on grades: Dai & Cromley, 2014; Lawson, Banks, & Logvin, 2007), and spatial skills (on grades: Hegarty, Stieff, & Dixon, 2013; on retention: Wai, Lubinski, &…”
Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. (2019, background): “…of students’ experiences in gateway STEM courses early in college for shaping students’ beliefs related to success, continuation, and motivation to pursue STEM throughout college (Cromley et al., 2016; Dai & Cromley, 2014; Gasiewski, Eagan, Garcia, Hurtado, & Chang, 2012; Perez et al., 2014).”