RECASTS AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

By J. Leeman. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2003

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0676e353d889912dddd0690bbda2ab822623b0b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax (2008, background): “The findings pointing to the selective role of recasts were also reported by Iwashita (2003), Ishida (2004), and Leeman (2003).”
IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS' RESPONSES ON ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT (2005, background): “…is whether learners recognize that negative feedback provides information about the acceptability of their language ~Birdsong, 1989; Carroll, 1995; Leeman, 2003!+ An interlocutor provides negative feedback for a variety of reasons, such as failure to hear what the learner said or Negative…”
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA (2010, background): “2 We then excluded all laboratory-based studies (e.g., Carroll & Swain, 1993; Leeman, 2003; Lyster & Izquierdo, 2009; Mackey & Philp, 1998; McDonough, 2005, 2007) and selected only quasi-experimental classroombased studies.”
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ORAL AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN THE ESL CLASSROOM (2010, background): “Leeman ( 2003 ) claimed that recasts are effective not because they provide negative evidence but because they serve as positive evidence.”
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY IN INTERACTION-DRIVEN L2 LEARNING (2012, background): “Because the type of structure may differentially affect the effectiveness of corrective feedback (Ellis, 2007 ; Iwashita, 2003 ; Leeman, 2003 ; Long et al., 1998 ; Sagarra, 2007 ), other structures in English or structures in other foreign or L2s should be tested in future research to confi rm or…”
ONE SIZE FITS ALL?: Recasts, Prompts, and L2 Learning (2006, methodology): “…CF technique because they are implicit, unobtrusive, and contingent on the learner’s intended meaning ~Doughty, 2001; Doughty & Varela, 1998; Leeman, 2003; Long, 1996; Ohta, 2000; Oliver, 1995!+ Others, however, argue that recasts are ambiguous and, therefore, might be less effective,…”
EFFECTS OF FORM-FOCUSED PRACTICE AND FEEDBACK ON CHINESE EFL LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR PAST TENSE FORMS (2010, background): “…amount of research has been conducted, in both laboratory and classroom contexts, regarding the type of evidence CF provides (Egi, 2007 a; Leeman, 2003 ) as well as the effectiveness of different types of CF (Ammar & Spada, 2006 ; Ellis, Loewen, & Erlam, 2006 ; Lyster, 2004 a; Lyster &…”
APTITUDE AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (2005, neutral): “…see e.g., White, 1998); input enhancement (see Leeman, Arteagoita, Fridman, & Doughty, 1995; Robinson, 1997b); recasting (Doughty & Varela, 1998; Leeman, 2003; Lyster, 2004; Philp, 2003); and structured input processing with and without rule explanation (Benati, 2004; Farley, 2004; VanPatten &…”
INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE (2006, background): “…ahead when the target forms in question are beyond the students’ current abilities+ At the same time, recasts serve as exemplars of positive evidence ~Braidi, 2002; Leeman, 2003! and, as such, can be expected to facilitate the encoding of new target representations when they occur in…”
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “…laboratory settings also suggest that the potential effects of recasts on L2 development may be unrelated to immediate repair (Mackey & Philp 1998; Leeman 2003; McDonough & Mackey 2006; McDonough 2007), leading Mackey & Philp (1998) to propose that repetitions of recasts ‘may be red herrings’ (p.…”