A Fad or a Phenomenon?: The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020, unknown): “…literature has a rich tradition based on extensive research over the years (Adner & Kapoor, 2010; Carrillo, Druehl, & Hsuan, 2015; Chesbrough, 2003; Chesbrough & Brunswick, 2014; Christensen, Rayneer, & McDonald, 2015; Cohen & Levinthal, 1990; Crossan & Apaydin, 2010; Ettlie, 2006; Gobble, 2014;…”
Open innovation: current status and research opportunities (2017, unknown): “Largely unstudied is if (and why) firms abandon OI (Chesbrough & Brunswicker, 2014).”
The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms (2018, methodology): “Prior work shows that open innovation is likely to remain pervasive as a component of R&D in large firms (Chesbrough 2003; Chesbrough and Brunswicker 2014).”
External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms (2017, background): “…large firms in Europe and the United States suggest that it is not easy to implement an OI program and there are a range of challenges and constraints that limit firms’ ability to make use of OI, the management of external relationships being an important challenge (Chesbrough & Brunswicker, 2014).”
Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model (2019, background): “Open innovation can be categorized into inbound and outbound activities [15].”