Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs

By Mark Freel, P. Robson. 2016

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aceef70fc279edb323878c3f3ba2cd2f5a4ea88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Daniel Prokop
2. Michele Grimaldi
3. Piers Thompson
4. Robert Huggins

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Piers Thompson
2. Daniel Prokop
3. Michele Grimaldi
4. L. Cricelli
5. Marco Greco
6. Robert Huggins
7. Andrew Johnston
8. Yee Kwan Tang

In Strategy and Management

1. Piers Thompson
2. Daniel Prokop
3. Robert Huggins
4. Michele Grimaldi
5. L. Cricelli
6. Marco Greco
7. E. Malecki
8. Michael Dowling

Citations in the corpus

• Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “Whilst proximity results in increased knowledge flows, it may also present adverse effects related to involuntary knowledge spillovers, indicating additional spatial complexity related to openness and appropriability (Laursen and Salter 2014; Freel and Robson 2017).”
• A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation (2021, background): “Given the complex relationship between OI and IP protection, several authors have explored the topic (e.g., Aloini et al., 2017; Freel & Robson, 2017; Zobel et al., 2017).”