Entrepreneurial Learning and Critical Reflection

By J. Cope. 2003

571 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0623dec984051e77178482ddb95627f133e3a9d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Reflection and Mindfulness in Organizations: Rationales and Possibilities for Integration (2009, background): “Drawing on John Dewey’s notion of inquiry (Dewey, 1949 [1938]) and Donald Schön’s concept of the refl ective practitioner (Schön, 1983, 1987), various authors have emphasized the role of refl ection on as well as in managerial practice (Cope, 2003; Elkjaer, 2001, 2004).”
Heuristics, learning and the business angel investment decision-making process (2015, background): “This view is consistent with the reliance on experiencing history, including failure as a ‘learning event’ (Cope 2003), more richly through exposure to multiple aspects and multiple interpretations of it as a social as well as individual process.”
Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (2014, background): “Entrepreneurial adjustments stimulated distinctive forms of ‘higher level’ learning (Cope 2003; Fiol and Lyles 1985) that challenged accumulated experience, which leads to the following proposition: Proposition 4: Entrepreneurial adjustments allow organizations to develop complementary…”
Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education (2020, methodology): “…challenge of assessing entrepreneurial education, an emotion-centric approach was opted for instead, since not only entrepreneurial learning (Cope, 2003; Gibb, Entrepreneurship in education 943 2002; Kyr€o, 2005; Pittaway and Cope, 2007; Souitaris et al., 2007) but also all learning…”
Learning with the market: Facilitating market innovation (2015, background): “Cope's (2003) literature review of higher-level learning illustrates two prevalent predispositions in the learning literature.”
Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity: Examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation (2015, background): “Both organizational learning and innovation have recently been shown to have a close connection with EO (Blackburn & Kovalainen, 2009; Cope, 2003; Ireland & Webb, 2007; Wang, 2008) and export intensity (Knight & Cavusgil, 2004).”
Causal ascriptions and perceived learning from entrepreneurial failure (2015, background): “Cope (2011), for example, argues that entrepreneurs have to distance themselves from a loss to be able to learn from it, and Shepherd and colleagues suggest that time to deal with the loss of a venture is important to one’s ability to recover and venture again following that loss, adding that some e”
The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review (2012, background): “This aims to change the (mental) frameworks, norms, policies and routines underlying day-to-day actions and routines (Cope, 2003).”
What is entrepreneurial failure? Implications for future research (2016, background): “For example, critical reflection, a key process in learning from experience, has been found to be important when learning from significant events (Cope, 2003) and failure (Byrne and Shepherd, 2013).”
The role of mentoring in the learning development of the novice entrepreneur (2012, background): “In certain cases, involved discussions about critical events with members of the entrepreneur’s network can facilitate and stimulate his thinking and learning ( Cope 2003: 445).”
Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment (2020, unknown): “Therefore, triggering the phases above takes a discontinuous event, a “disorienting dilemma” or “crisis”, best characterized as breakdowns in the flow of actions that forces actors to question current practice (Cope, 2003; Mezirow, 1991).”