The role of leadership self-efficacy and stereotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral and self-report responses in the leadership domain

By Crystal L. Hoyt, J. Blascovich. 2010

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/048dc71feb97d38bedb83fcb672cccfcd00b4148

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. S. Murphy
2. Crystal L. Hoyt
3. J. Lammers
4. H. Zacher

In Gender Studies

1. S. Murphy
2. H. Zacher
3. Elise K. Kalokerinos
4. C. von Hippel
5. Crystal L. Hoyt
6. J. Lammers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. H. Zacher
2. Elise K. Kalokerinos
3. C. von Hippel
4. S. Murphy
5. Crystal L. Hoyt
6. J. Lammers
7. M. Schmid Mast

Citations in the corpus

• Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016, background): “…ability, as indicated by high levels of leadership self-efficacy (Murphy, 1992), responded positively when put in a position to disconfirm the gender–leadership stereotype on a task requiring women to advise and motivate employees on a simulated hiring committee (Hoyt & Blascovich, 2007, 2010).”
• Successful female leaders empower women's behavior in leadership tasks (2013, background): “…that women are less likely to succeed in leadership can undermine women's performance on leadership-related tasks such as motivating employees (Hoyt & Blascovich, 2010; von Hippel, Wiryakusuma, Bowden, & Shochet, 2011), managerial decision-making (Bergeron, Block, & Echtenkamp, 2006), or…”
• Is Stereotype Threat a Useful Construct for Organizational Psychology Research and Practice? (2014, background): “More efficacious women also performed better on a simulated hiring committee and reported greater levels of well-being after exposure to acute stereotype threat compared to women lower in leadership efficacy (Hoyt, 2005; Hoyt & Blascovich, 2007, 2010).”
• Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development tool (2014, unknown): “Our analysis of the focus group discussion in the first part of our study led us to suggest leader role efficacy (LRE) (Hannah et al., 2008; Hoyt & Blascovich, 2010) and leaders' trust in subordinates (Spreitzer & Mishra, 1999) as appropriate outcome criteria that link both theory and practice.”