From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research
By Sea-Jin Chang, A. van Witteloostuijn, Lorraine Eden. 2010
3,383 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03953274bc99c7820c1035cd23b86a9fc6c8dd0f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- N. Boso
- G. Shirokova
- Carlos M. P. Sousa
- Tatiana Beliaeva
- Fabian Jintae Froese
- V. Story
- Jieke Chen
- Dave J. Ketchen
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance (2012, methodology): “In addition, as suggested by Podsakoff and Organ (1986), reporting on discrete events reduces the likelihood of CMV.”
- Methodological issues in international HR management research (2012, background): “This problem is likely to be more acute when survey-based measures are purely attitudinal or perceptual, as opposed to factual and objective, and come from the same source (Chang, Witteloostuijn and Eden 2010 ).”
- The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: The influence of contextual factors (2021, methodology): “The multiple remedies largely reduced CMB.”
- High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation (2015, unknown): “To allay problems of common method bias (Podsakoff et al. 2003) and overreliance on weak post hoc statistical test procedures (Chang, Van Witteloostuijn, and Eden 2010), collecting data from multiple informants, such as supervisory ratings of employees’ OCBs and aff ective commitment, would be…”