“Doing well by doing good”? Ambivalent moral framing in organizations

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it (2013, background): “Kreps and Monin (2011) elaborate on how individuals within organizations manage mismatches between the private desire or motivation to frame an issue morally with the public or organizational need to diminish the issue‟s moral content.”
Ethical Leadership and Ethical Voice: The Mediating Mechanisms of Value Internalization and Integrity Identity (2021, background): “Ethical voice involves high personal risk as prior research has suggested that ethical voicers may be seen as “hypocritical,” “incompetent,” or “judgmental” (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007; Greenbaum et al., 2015; Kreps & Monin, 2011).”
From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation? (2018, unknown): “Kreps & Monin, 2011).”
Conceptualization and Measurement of Virtuous Leadership: Doing Well by Doing Good (2016, background): “Moreover, most people have strong intuitions about the moral sense of virtues at an early age (Kreps and Monin, 2011).”