Electronic bullying among middle school students.

By Robin M. Kowalski, Susan P. Limber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2007

1,373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0261a1af13a19ec737924d946c7d7ff3db7f6156

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Going Cyber: Using Routine Activities Theory to Predict Cyberbullying Experiences (2012, background): “Indeed, in reviewing past literature, adolescent females are often found to be at a higher risk for experiencing cyberbullying versus adolescent males (Kowalski and Limber 2007; Wolak et al. 2006).”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, methodology): “Although some research supports this hypothesis (e.g., Kowalski & Limber, 2007), other research has found no statistically significant difference between girls and boys in rates of cyberbullying perpetration or victimization (e.g., Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Slonje & Smith, 2008; P. K. Smith et al.,…”
Cyberbullying and subjective health : A large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden (2013, background): “In a U.S. study of nearly 4000 middle school students, about half of the cyberbullying victims knew the identity of the perpetrators (although 48% did not know who had cyberbullied them) (Kowalski & Limber, 2007).”
Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? (2012, background): “More details about this sample can be found in Kowalski and Limber (2007) and Kowalski, Limber, and Agatston (2008).”
Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization (2010, background): “For instance, Kowalski and Limber (2007) and Ybarra et al. (2006) demonstrate positive associations between age and frequency of victimization in their studies examining 11– 14 year olds and 10–15 year olds, respectively.”
Cyberbullying in College (2014, background): “Cyberbullying among K-12 populations has been reported as ranging from 9% to 42% (Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Li, 2007).”
‘I h8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying (2010, background): “, 2006 ; Kowalski & Limber, 2007 ; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008 ; Smith et al , 2008 ), some have included the uploading of images onto websites, the distribution of images via mobile phones (Fight Crime Pre‐teen, 2006 ; Fight Crime Teen, 2006 ; Smith et al , 2006 , 2008 ), or the posting of me”
Psychiatric Symptomatology as a Predictor of Cyberbullying among University Students (2009, background): “Descriptive statistics demonstrate that there are more cybervictims than cyberbullies, a finding that is consistent with previous studies (ANCOMM, 2008; Kowalski & Limber, 2007; Li, 2006; Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007).”
Cyberbullying as an Act of Revenge? (2010, background): “This is made possible through the equalising characteristics of the Internet and its ability to preempt the relevance of physical intimidation (Kowalski & Limber, 2007).”