Effects of Perceived Economic Competition on People’s Willingness to Help Empower Immigrants
By L. Jackson, Victoria M. Esses. 2000
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/009d6a593ae9f6fd96ecfbce85357591e6554f1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Mark R. Wojda
- John F. Dovidio
- Andrew N. Christopher
- A. A. Khan
- S. Moss
- Arie Nadler
- Imran Hameed
- M. Verkuyten
In Sociology and Political Science
- John F. Dovidio
- Mark R. Wojda
- Lotte Thomsen
- Andrew N. Christopher
- M. Verkuyten
- J. Sidanius
- S. Halabi
- Arie Nadler
Citations in the corpus
- Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism (2006, background): “Buttressing Pratto et al.’s (1994) conclusion that “SDO is pertinent to the dynamics of group conflict and institutional discrimination” (p. 757), Jackson and Esses (2000) found that high SDOs disapproved of empowering immigrants by removing impediments to their success, a relationship partially…”
- Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method (2004, unknown): “Independently, Jackson and Esses (2000) have shown that reducing perceptions of the group threat posed by immigrants reduces prejudice against them by those low in SDO, but that this intervention does not work for those high in SDO.”
- Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Sexism, and Prejudice Toward Women in the Workforce (2008, background): “In a subsequent investigation (Jackson & Esses, 2000), this conclusion was buttressed in a sample of undergraduates: Those high in SDO were against empowering immigrants by removing impediments to the success of the immigrants.”
- Support for Multiculturalism and Minority Rights: The Role of National Identification and Out-group Threat (2009, background): “Authoritarianism and social dominance have been used to explain reactions toward immigrants and the support for multiculturalism and minority rights (e.g., Danso, Sedlovskaya, & Suanda, 2007; Jackson & Esses, 2000 ).”
- When and How Do High Status Group Members Offer Help: Effects of Social Dominance Orientation and Status Threat (2008, methodology): “pattern of findings, which conforms to the effect for competition in the Jackson and Esses study (Study 1), suggests the generalizability of their conclusions. Whereas Jackson and Esses (2000) examined SDO and threat in separate studies, we examined both within the same design.”
- When and How Subordinate Performance Leads to Abusive Supervision: A Social Dominance Perspective (2018, background): “…persecution, resistance to providing assistance to ethnic minorities, and even support for collective violence against ethnic minority groups (e.g., Costello & Hodson, 2014; Halabi, Dovidio, & Nadler, 2008; Jackson & Esses, 2000; Stephan, Ybarra, & Bachman, 1999; Thomsen, Green, & Sidanius; 2008).”
- We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways (2008, background): “While both SDO and RWA should be generally associated with outgroup aggression (see also Bourhis & Dayan, 2004; Esses & Hodson, 2006; Hodson & Esses, 2005; Jackson & Esses, 2000; Schwarzwald & Tur-Kaspa, 1997), our core prediction was that there are predictable, specifiable circumstances under whi”
- Who Can Enter? A Multilevel Analysis on Public Support for Immigration Criteria across 20 European Countries (2009, background): “Viewing immigrant outgroups as competitors leads to prejudice, regardless of whether an objective threat exists (Jackson & Esses, 2000).”