Who Can Enter? A Multilevel Analysis on Public Support for Immigration Criteria across 20 European Countries

By E. Green. 2009

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/772a09f6c68da2c198b7398a2a0e6dbc77e829e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Verkuyten
2. E. Green
3. J. Sidanius
4. C. Ward
5. Mathijs Kros
6. Kieran Mepham
7. Gal Ariely
8. Walter G. Stephan

Citations in the corpus

• Globalization, immigration and national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants? (2012, background): “Such studies confirm the role of economic conditions (Green, 2009; Meuleman, 2011; Semyonov, Raijman, & Gorodzeisky, 2008), the relative numbers (or perceived numbers) of immigrants (Kunovich, 2006; Meuleman, 2011; Schlueter & Wagner, 2008; Semyonov et al., 2008) as well as the type of nationhood…”
• Intergroup Anxiety (2014, background): “…studies and multi-level analyses that examine societal as well as individual causes of intergroup anxiety, similar to those that have been done on other aspects of intergroup relations (e.g., Green, 2009; Kunovich, 2004; Vervoort, Scholte, & Scheepers, 2011) would be especially valuable.”
• Public attitudes towards support for migrants: the importance of perceived voluntary and involuntary migration (2018, background): “And across 20 European nations, it was found that acquired criteria over which migrants themselves have control are much more important for the acceptance of migrants in one’s country than ascribed criteria that cannot be changed (Green 2009).”
• Does Size Really Matter? On the Relationship between Immigrant Group Size and Anti-Immigrant Prejudice 1 (2017, background): “Other studies attempt to approximate the public’s perception of the “other,” by limiting the group size measure to only non-Western immigrants (Schneider 2008), non-white immigrants (Hjerm 2009), undocumented migrants (Tolbert and Hero 2001), or refugees (Green 2009).”
• Contextual influences on acculturation processes: The roles of family, community and society (2010, background): “The psychological literature of acculturation further distinguishes between group and individual acculturation, primarily focussing on individual-level changes resulting from intercultural contact ( Graves, 1967 ), and adaptive outcomes of the process in both psychological and social domains (Ward, ”
• We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways (2008, background): “Future studies ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Ethnic persecution 26 26 should pursue all of these possibilities to more fully explore the function of status maintenance and boundary control in immigrant acculturation (see also Green, 2007, 2008).”